Financial Theory

Explore the world of financial theories with our comprehensive guidebooks. Uncover key concepts, strategies, and models that shape financial decision-making. Gain valuable insights into market behavior, investment principles, and economic dynamics. Empower yourself with knowledge to make informed financial choices and navigate the complexities of the financial landscape.

Volatility Clustering

Volatility Clustering refers to a phenomenon observed in financial markets where periods of high market volatility are likely to be followed by periods of high volatility, while periods of low volatility are likely to be followed by periods of low volatility. This pattern, or clustering of volatility, is often seen in stock market returns and is one of the key features in many financial time series models.

The concept is particularly important in financial modelling and risk management, as understanding volatility clustering can help in predicting forthcoming market volatility and in making informed investment decisions. These observations form the basis of models like the Auto Regressive Conditional Heteroskedasticity (ARCH) and the Generalized Auto Regressive Conditional Heteroskedasticity (GARCH) models.

The main reason behind this occurrence is that markets react to information or certain events, which leads to a rise in volatility due to increased trading activity. Once the information is fully absorbed, the market tends to calm down until the next piece of significant news arrives.

Efficient Market Hypothesis

The Efficient Market Hypothesis (EMH) is a financial theory suggesting that asset prices fully reflect all available information. It implies that all investors have equal access to the same information about a company’s prospects, so no one can gain an upper hand on others and consistently profit from trading shares.

EMH suggests that it’s impossible to “beat the market” as the stock market efficiency causes existing share prices to always incorporate and reflect all relevant information. This theory is divided into three forms: weak form efficiency (past price information is reflected in the current price), semi-strong form efficiency (all public information is reflected in current prices), and strong form efficiency (all public and private information is fully reflected in the market prices).

The EMH supports the idea of investing in index funds which aim at matching the overall market performance, rather than trying to pick an outperforming stock which could lead to riskier portfolios. However, critics argue that the market often overreacts or underreacts to news, creating opportunities for profit.

Efficient Frontier

The efficient frontier is a concept in modern portfolio theory, which refers to a collection of optimal portfolios that offer the highest expected return for a specific level of risk, or the lowest risk for a given level of expected return.

In other words, portfolios that lie below the efficient frontier are considered sub-optimal because they do not provide enough return for the level of risk. Portfolios that cluster to the right of the efficient frontier are also sub-optimal because they have a higher level of risk for the defined rate of return.

Overall, the concept of the efficient frontier helps investors to identify the most favorable trade-off between risk and return for their investment strategy.

Systematic Risk

Systematic risk, also known as market risk or non-diversifiable risk, refers to the overall risk that affects all businesses and investments in the market. This type of risk is caused by factors that are beyond the control of a specific company or individual, such as economic conditions, geopolitical events, interest rates, inflation, and market volatility. Since it affects the entire market, systematic risk cannot be eliminated or reduced through diversification. Investors typically require a higher expected return for taking on higher systematic risk.

Unsystematic Risk

Unsystematic risk, also known as specific risk or idiosyncratic risk, refers to the risk associated with a specific company or industry. This type of risk can be reduced or eliminated through diversification – by investing in a variety of assets or companies. It is unique to a particular company or industry and can be caused by factors such as changes in management, company operations, consumer demand, labor strikes, or product recall. This contrasts with systematic risk, which affects overall market and cannot be eliminated through diversification.

Security Market Line

The Security Market Line (SML) is a line on a diagram that illustrates the expected return of a security or portfolio of securities at different levels of systematic, or market, risk. It is a crucial concept in the Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM), which uses the SML to quantify the relationship between risk and expected return.

The Y-axis on the SML graph represents expected return of a security/portfolio, while the X-axis represents systematic risk (beta). The SML slope is determined by the risk premium in the market.

In the context of CAPM, a security that is correctly priced should plot along the SML. If it plots above, it is considered undervalued (since it gives higher returns for a given risk). If it plots below, it is overvalued (provides lower returns for its risk level).

Random Walk Hypothesis

The Random Walk Hypothesis is a financial theory stating that stock market prices evolve according to a random walk and thus cannot be predicted. It is consistent with the efficient-market hypothesis.

The concept can be traced back to the work of French mathematician Louis Bachelier and holds that the past movement or trend of a stock price or market cannot be used to predict its future movement. In other words, price changes are random and not influenced by past price changes. The theory has been particularly influential in finance since the 1970s.

The hypothesis argues that the fundamental factors, like future earnings or dividend payouts, that reflect in stock prices change randomly and cause price changes to occur randomly. As such, mathematical models and charts aiming to predict future price movements are considered to be of little or no value. This theory takes the viewpoint that it is just as likely for a stock price to rise as it is for it to fall.

Capital Asset Pricing Model CAPM

The Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM) is a theoretical model used in finance to determine the expected return on an investment, given its risk relative to the market as a whole. It sets the relationship between the expected return and risk, and it’s used to price risky securities and to generate an expected return which should account for the riskiness of these securities.

The model takes into account the asset’s sensitivity to non-diversifiable risk (also known as systematic risk or market risk), often represented by the beta (β) in the financial industry, as well as the expected return of the market and the expected return of a theoretical risk-free asset. CAPM is a widely-used finance theory that establishes a linear relationship between the required return on an investment and risk.

The formula of the model is:
Expected Return = Risk-Free Rate + β (Market Return – Risk-Free Rate)

Black Swan

A Black Swan is a term used in finance and investing that refers to an unpredictable event that is beyond what is normally expected of a situation and has potentially severe consequences. These events are typically random and unexpected.

The term was popularized by Nassim Nicholas Taleb, a finance professor, writer, and former Wall Street trader. He described a Black Swan as an event that is rare, extreme, and unpredictable, and yet in retrospect, people attempt to concoct explanations for its occurrence, as if it was predictable.

Examples of Black Swan events include the financial crisis of 2008, the dot-com bubble of the 2000s, and more recently, the COVID-19 pandemic. These are all events that disrupted normal economic behaviors and had severe financial implications.

It’s important to note that a Black Swan event is not necessarily negative. It can also be a positive occurrence that was not anticipated, like the rapid technological advances and resultant economic growth of the internet age.

The idea is that the occurrence of such “Black Swans” should make us realize that our methods for predicting future events or risks are inadequate, as they do not account for these extreme and unpredictable events. Therefore, we should alter our way of preparing and responding to such events.

Jump to ...